Planning to build a mobile app? – Yes.
Arranged funds? – Yes.
Expanded team? – No, it’s under process.
The app development idea progress gets halt right at this point.
You must be thinking- Why is it so?
A few decades back, the companies will have only one choice, that’s- publishing a job description ad, shortlisting the candidates, interviewing them, and then selecting the best ones. You need to arrange more decks for more employees. Now, the scene of team expansion changed to building a remote team that’s hired differently from the in-house hiring approach.
Both forms of hiring models- hiring remote workers and in-house workers have their pros and cons. It confuses the companies as to choose which one and which not. There’s no dried-and-cut way to declare a winner between the two. To clear up the air, our expertise has created parameters with a one-to-one comparison that tells- which approach is better for the companies having specific objectives and project requirements.
Let’s first understand the types of teams in a nutshell:
In-house Developer Team
The most common model involves hiring the employee that works in the office premises along with other employees. Acquiring the talent in-house results in creating a team structure, ensuring stellar communication, and guaranteeing trust.
Remote Developer Team
It’s a fixed-bid traditional model wherein the employees are hired directly or through vendor cooperation to complete the project before the deadline. It involves searching a vendor and writing the requirements for remote hiring, and then the team is managed remotely.
Which is better- in-house vs. remote developer team?
Involvement in project
The in-house team works on one project depending on the expertise that allows them to laser-focus and dedicatedly work on the project. The total immersion in the project provides an opportunity to participate in the strategic development of the project.
On the other hand, the remote team works on multiple projects simultaneously that barely allow them to immerse in the project. It’s so because the remote employees are self-employed employees who work with a company as part-time employees or on a contractual basis.
Freedom to experiment
When the in-house hiring option is considered, the team doesn’t work to complete the task before the deadline. Instead, the in-house employees try to experiment with the idea to increase the app’s appeal and work beyond the client’s expectations.
On the flip side, the remote employees aimed to finish the job in the allotted time. Plus, as working from the house, they experience no professionals around them, which negatively influences their skills.
When hiring employees in-house, the employers need to provide several perks such as health insurance, commute, gratuity, and other benefits, in addition to wages. Plus, the infrastructure cost including- office rent, software license, electricity bills, and other bills, which are unavoidable. Not to forget, employee acquisition cost, continuous training, and retention add an extra burden on the employer’s shoulder.
Hiring the remote team is a cost-effective option as it involves no obligations towards offshore workers. The cost of acquisition of offshore team is less as opposed to in-house team hiring. Additionally, there is no need to upskill them, arrange office space and equipment, and pay utility bills. All of these things together lower down the expenses and increase the profit accordingly.
The employees when allowed to work from home, they feel that the company trusts them. The remote option is also preferred by the employees, which means you are making them happy. A happy employee works dedicatedly and considers it’s their responsibility to perform to the notch. Plus, the earnings get impacted with project execution. Investing time, dollars, and efforts in retaining remote employees is comparatively low as compared to in-house talent.
It’s often thought that in-house teams yield more output as they are under observation during office hours. It’s not the case always. The studies have proven that remote workers produce great results due to reduced distractions created in the office.
One more reason behind the improved results- they schedule work and other tasks when they are free, and the management allows them to finish more tasks in a day. It allows employees to maintain a balance between their work and other areas of life. That’s why the workers and employers preferring remote hiring options in the IT space.
There is a wrong impression about office employees that’s all the employees are connected and apt at communication. When we look at reality, things are different. For instance, one team member doesn’t communicate the meeting info to another team member in the thought- someone else has informed him. The miscommunication creates a conflict. Plus, the employee may feel hesitant when talking to their superiors.
On the other hand, the work of remote workers relies on constant communication. The workflow depends on the capability of continuous interaction and seamless communication. Instead, they prefer to engage regularly with the company as miscommunication delays project deliveries, submissions, and others. Stellar communication boosts productivity.
The cultural difference for Developer Team
In the offices, the companies often think that the diversity of talent makes the team works on the projects efficiently. However, when the remote option is considered, they are good at diversity. See how? The remote option provides access to talent cross-borders, which expands the team’s skills and expertise. It improves the opportunities for businesses to engineer projects that require a diverse talent base.
Additionally, the time zone differences problem gets solved, when you hire react Native remote employees from Asian countries as they provide 24*7 services when half of the world is asleep.
Risks for Hiring Developer Team
The in-house employees need to answer the delays or failures made in the project. It negatively impacts the performance, appraisal, and even the job subjected to risks.
The remote employees are hired after considering their experience and portfolio, but still, the risks exist while associating with them. It’s better to hire remote developers from IT companies that have complete control over their employees and ensure the best performance.
Flexibility Developer Hire Model
Micromanagement of various responsibilities is quite a task, especially for millennials. The office goers with 9 to 5 schedules are tied to their job responsibilities and don’t have the freedom to bring changes into the work schedule other than taking leaves.
That’s the reason they show more inclination towards the remote option. It allows creating a work schedule while managing the duties, daily errands, appointments, events, and more. the flexibility makes the employees accountable for their work, and they collaboratively work with the company.
It’s expected that two-thirds of the companies across the globe would prefer the remote model. It signals remaining one-third of the companies go ahead with the in-house hiring options. Both hiring approaches- the in-house model and remote hiring model suit best for the companies depending on the project development needs, resources requirements, and budget. Declaring a winner between two models is out of the question. Companies should scrutinize their goals and project needs before making a choice.